Derek and the white-power dominoes
By David Neiwert Wednesday Dec 03, 2008 4:00pm
[Derek Black, right, and his dad Don Black, January 10, 2007, "Values Voters" Conference in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.]
White supremacists have been trying to reinsert themselves back into the mainstream (where once upon a time they were common) for a long time now. One of the chief avenues for this effort has for years been the Republican Party in the South, particularly in places like Louisiana, where David Duke operates, and Mississippi, where the Council of Conservative Citizens has a friend in Gov. Haley Barbour. It's all part of the legacy of the Southern Strategy.
In Florida, Republicans are now being confronted with the legacy of the Southern Strategy in the person of Derek Black:
Derek Black says "of course" he will attend a meeting Wednesday for new members of Palm Beach County's Republican Executive Committee. Never mind that the party chairman says Black's "white supremacist" associations are not welcome and he will not be seated.
"I was elected," Black, 19, says.
Sporting a black hat, the son of former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard Don Black was seated last week in a restaurant off Southern Boulevard. Sitting next to him was one of his supporters: David Duke, former Louisiana state legislator and another former KKK grand wizard.
"We're going to fight," Duke said. "I know Derek Black is going to fight for his constitutional liberties. That's why I'm here, because I want to assist Derek."
Sorry, says county GOP Chairman Sid Dinerstein. In the qualifying period in June, Black didn't sign a loyalty oath pledging he would not do anything injurious to the party. And that's not the only problem.
"He participates in white supremacist activities," Dinerstein said. "We're the party of Lincoln. We're the party that says we don't judge anybody by the color of their skin."
There's a familial connection between David Duke and Derek Black: Derek's mother, Chloe Black, was previously married to Duke, and their son is Derek's half-brother. But there's also a strategic connection, in that Duke did the same thing himself in the 1980's and '90s in Louisiana, largely taking advantage of the Republicans' Southern Strategy.
In his book on the Southern Strategy, Joseph Aistrup describes this (cited here):
Using the basics of Reagan’s rhetoric, and mimicking the Reagan administration’s attack on civil rights, Bush vetoed the first version of the Civil Rights Act (1990) on the basis that it represented a “quota” bill. This strategy most likely would have succeeded, except for the emergence of Louisiana Republican and former Klansman, David Duke. David Duke's emergence as a Republican is an unintended consequence of the Southern Strategy’s race issue orientation (Page 1991, B7). Although Republican strategists are fully aware that the Southern Strategy entices voters of the same mold as David Duke (Evans and Novak 1991, A27), they find it extremely distasteful when a racial reactionary leader becomes a Republican candidate, wins a state legislative seat as a Republican, and is one of two finalists in the Louisiana U.S. Senate (1990) and governor (1991) contests. White House press spokesman Marlin Fitzwater said of Duke: “He’s not a Republican, he never will be a Republican ... We don’t like him.”
Aside from Duke’s overt racism, the Duke affair is distasteful to Republicans because candidates like Duke expose how the Southern Strategy’s conservative message can be racially interpreted by many Southern whites, lending credence to Democrats’ claims concerning the racially divisive nature of the Southern Strategy’s issues (McQueen and Birnbaum 1991, A18). However, the most disturbing aspect of David Duke for the Republicans and Bush was that he elicited rhetoric straight from the Bush campaign: Opposing “quotas,” affirmative action, and any type of minority preference; assailing those who are on welfare; and blaming government and special interests for the poor state of Louisiana’s economy.
Sure enough, as Jesse notes at Pandagon:
In true Republican fashion, rather than realize that there’s something fundamentally screwy and in need of fixing given a process in which a white supremacist not only feels comfortable running on your ticket, but wins, they’re instead seeking to throw him off the committee to which he was elected fair and square because of a technicality.
Republicans have made this bed. Now they get to sleep in it.



Login or Register to post comments.
in the name Black
against KKK members being allowed to PROCREATE.
Jesus.
Yeah, the good ole' south! Where Stupid meets Angry
I take offense at this statement...while I'll be the first to admit that, yes, we have our fair share of stupid, angry, racist assholes.
That seems to be a nationwide thing...and as I've mentioned before, some of the most virulent racists I ever met were from New York.
So save the stereotypes, ignorance is everywhere.
Why is it impossible to investigate a murder scene in the south?
All the DNA is the same, and there ain't no dental records!
HA!
Check the Web for confirmation-David Duke is sucking up to Islamic terrorists in an effort to gain allies for his anti-Semitic agenda.
In this end of the South, KKK often deals in quantity cocaine and heroin in order to resell to, and slowly annihilate, the African-American community. Funds gained thereby are used for propaganda and guns. Mexican illegal immigration in this area was commenced by local manufacturers anxious to exclude black workers from their jobs. Now that Mexicans are bringing in meth and brown heroin, these same racists have little brown grandchildren and the newest class of welfaristas are the crank-creep offspring of white supremacists. If there is a fundamentalist God, he has a snarky sense of humor.
"A community college student who was home-schooled in West Palm Beach, Black once contributed a kids page to his father's Stormfront Internet forum around the time he was 12. The page included puzzles, games, animated Confederate flags and white-pride songs. He has since helped with his father's Internet audio broadcasts."
Palm Beach Post
look what i found, doing a google search on the guy:
Father and son team on hate site
http://www.usatoday.com/life/2001-07-16-kid-h...
stormfront for kids! yay.
The county GOP chairman states; "We're the party that says we don't judge anybody by the color of their skin."
By inserting "that says" in the sentence he lets it slip that they pay lip service to inclusion without really including.
GOP, RIP.
No white supremicist home is complete without the newest in digital converters. BigoTV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llqM94-bYvg
The glowing, golden "t" at the end was a nice touch as well.
The only problem I ever have with empathic satire like this is that the brunts of the humor are never kidding. Just ask Emmett Till.
You mean just because of this fish-belly color of my body = I'm better than everybody else?!
Funny, I don't feel any smarter...
...I'd swear, I'm still an eejit....
Why is this even an issue anymore?
Here's my race: human.
The goddamn neo-confederates can kiss my pale, scrawny Irish arse!
Using the Derek and the Dominoes name in this title is an insult to the great band, fronted by Eric Clapton, which recorded classics like Layla. These idiots have nothing in common with the band, but other idiots will no doubt come up with some comparison. I don't mind writers being witty, but try to do so without impuning the name of those involved in great music or other types of achievements. The twits in places like Faux News will usurp the name and ultimately cause the great name of Derek and the Dominoes to be closely associated with the horrible attitude of racism instead of the great music they created. Writers, bloggers, etc should take care of whom they are smearing by irresponsible use of names, etc.
If there had been some connection, like associating these people with George Wallace or something, the comparison would be valid. But in this case it is only irresponsible.
Using the Derek and the Dominoes name in this title is an insult to the great band...
HEARTILY agree.
Yeah, it's a great album an a' that - but I think that it was just an unfortunate choice while seeking an attention-grabbing headline.
I take no offense.
He didn't sign the loyalty oath pledging his undying loyalty to the
VaterlandNeocons.Unfortunate choice is probably a good way to describe it. In my comment, I was not trying to go off the deep end about it. Was just making a point. I'm sensitive to something like this because of the irresponsible way that the media tosses about expressions and "plays on words" which ultimately lead to the original meanings being changed. I just wish that there was more forethought about the possible negative results in using references incorrectly and irresponsibly.
Only reminded me that I haven't listened to their masterpiece in too long, so I'm grateful for the post.
Any reason Ron Paul was cropped out of this version of the photo? It's not as if there's no room for it.
Just wondering.
Good eye mon
here on C&L during the primaries. Wish this picture could have been posted here back then. That would have shut the nutters up.....nah, prolly not.
Just wow.
Every time I come around to Paul, something like this emerges!
So blatant and unrepentent racists can't be seated because they didn't sign a Mc Carthyite loyalty oath? Party of Lincoln? LOL--George Lincoln Rockwell maybe? Only the massively dysfunctional Republicans could embroil themselves in such a vile and stupid controversy.
They should just pack it in and start over in somewhere like Paraguay where they would be welcomed as heroes.
I was hoping it wasn't something like that. And David's a really good guy. He was one of the first to call attention to Paul's association with the Klan.
I wonder what he thinks about this little editing job.
What a glow he has....biggots admire themselves so much.
Smash em up, beat em up, grind them to pulp.
Antifa!
:s
1. you always want these nutjobs operating out in the open.
2. the more out in the open they are, the better it is that everyone can see that their party affiliation is republican.
Roaches and vermin prefer the cover of darkness, so that luxury must never be provided for them-- unless one doesn't mind being surrounded by roaches and vermin.
He has singing cockroaches that will be there all week.
First and foremost, I would like to congratulate you on how long you have appreciated your hypocrisy throughout the last eight terrible years.
I admire the fact that you and your neocon cronies have broken Godwin's Law countless times by comparing Obama, the Democrats, and liberals to Nazis, yet you willingly invite neo-Nazis and white supremacists such as Derek Black, Hal Turner, and Tony Zirkle into your political circle. Whether you are too oblivious or stupid to notice people like them to be right under your nose, I think it's amazing that you guys continue to wear your black hat with a smile without any shame or dignity, and still parade around the mainstream media -- that you claim to be under "liberal control" -- to break said law. Oh, and by the way, were you guys referring to the "Jews" in place of "liberal?"
Well, I hope you guys "stay the course" because once James Dobson takes the GOP from that "left-leaning backstabber," Kathleen Parker, the GOP will be just about as relevant to American politics as that organization your party has been aiming to be all along, the American Nazi Party. After all, you guys want your party to be more conservative than ever, so go ahead, keep inviting people like Derek Black and David Duke into your crippled party, you won't regret it!
Good Luck!
The irony is that had he taken the loyalty oath, he then would have been as big a hypocrite as those in the Party to which he claims to belong.
snark /all
If you want to attract minority voters, nothing says BIG TENT better than allowing known racists to lead your party, and then defending yourself with weak statements.
/end snark
You gotta love the GOP. They constantly prove that racism is not dead in America and in fact it has a home in a major political party's apparatus, even if the other members don't necessarily like it.
I was in Louisiana during that 1990 election. It was Buddy Roemer (D-Crook) vs David Duke (R-Racist). What wonderful choices...
INBREEDING! eeeewwwwww!
What a couple of stupid lookin fucktards.
He ran against a corrupt Democratic incumbent and the Democrats responded with two of the best political slogans of all time:
"Better the Crook than the Klan", and my favorite
"Better a lizard than a wizard".
Marry each others ex-wives, inter-marry with step-brothers and step-sisters. Not to mention, marrying first cousins. No wonder these people are so dysfunctional.
> "He participates in white supremacist activities,"
> Dinerstein said. "We're the party of Lincoln. We're
> the party that says we don't judge anybody by the
> color of their skin."
What total bullshit. The Republinazi Party has been the Christofascist Right's Party of choice since even before the 1988 Presidential Elections. Republicanism is a synonym for racist Christian hate.
you beat me to the punch.
That was the first thing that popped into my mind was "Why did C&L crop out Ron Paul from this picture?"
I first saw it on Orcinus, D. Neiwerts blog, and showed it to every single Ron Paul goon I knew at the time. That Mr. Neiwert wrote the post keeps me from thinking anything nefarious about the crop, but still, I know there were quite a few Paulites skulking about the comment threads and I would love to see their reaction to Dr. No's white supremacist connections being displayed.
Since this is a party function, the party can do whatever the hell they please. (Recall Michigan and Florida in the primaries) I wasn't aware that one had any 'constitutional right' to belong to or serve in any capacity for a political party.
This person is a fascist and belongs in the republican party. They stand for all that is wrong in the world. There should be a constitutional ammendment that does not allow the republican party to exist. In addition to being lying, deceitful, evil, bigoted, caustic, insidious, antiquated, holocaust denying, stereotyping, paranoid, violent, harassing, rancorous worshippers of money, they also comfort themselves by inflicting misery in others; that would most aptly be represented by ostentatiously cloaking themselves in a vail of baby tears. Their hate is stiffling.
Login or Register to post comments.